The Hunt
Asset-light vs scale economics: the two engines
The two kinds of business our research hunts for, and why they compound in completely different ways.

Great compounders come in two very different shapes, and our research runs a separate pass for each so it never misses one for looking like the other.
Asset-light compounders
These businesses turn a little capital into a lot of profit: software, platforms, brands, networks, intellectual property, distribution rights. Once the product exists, serving the next customer costs almost nothing, so margins are high and growth throws off cash instead of eating it. The dream version compounds for years without ever raising much money. Constellation Software, Visa, and the great franchise brands live here. What we look for is a high-margin model where each new customer is nearly pure profit, protected by an edge competitors cannot easily copy.
Scale-economics engines
These businesses start with thinner margins and win by getting bigger. As volume grows, cost per unit falls, the company hands some of that saving to customers, that wins more volume, and the cycle repeats. The flywheel is the moat. Amazon and Costco are the textbook cases: not high-margin businesses, but nearly unbeatable once scale kicks in, because no smaller rival can match the price and survive. What we look for is a real, improving cost advantage, where getting bigger makes the whole machine stronger rather than just larger.
Why we run both
Judge everything by one yardstick and you throw away half the winners. Demand fat margins and you miss every Amazon. Demand obvious scale and you miss every capital-light franchise. So we score the two archetypes on their own terms, then merge the survivors into one ranked list. When a company is tagged asset-light or scale economics in our rankings, that tag is which engine it runs, and which questions matter most for it.