Methodology
How we screen
Multibagger is a research tool, not a stock picker. It evaluates a company as a business across two horizons (10× in five years and 100× in fifteen) and publishes ranked, scrubbed shortlists with a written thesis for each name.
Valuation is excluded by design
The screen never gates on price. A great business is a great business at any quote; whether today's price is a smart entry is a separate question we deliberately leave to you. Keeping the two apart is what lets the engine stay focused on durability and compounding instead of chasing what looks cheap this week.
Two archetypes, judged on their own terms
Every candidate is read through one of two lenses. Asset-light compounders earn high margins and reinvest cheaply; scale-economics engines run thinner margins but widen their advantage as they grow. Scoring each archetype separately catches both the software-style compounder and the Costco-style operator, instead of throwing one away for not looking like the other.
Gates before scoring
Names must clear hard gates first: enough size to be a real company, genuine revenue (no pre-commercial story stocks), and accessibility for ordinary investors. Certain markets and categories are excluded for accessibility reasons. Only what passes the gates gets scored.
Per-share, not headline
Growth bought by issuing stock is not compounding. We measure growth on a per-share basis, which quietly removes the names whose impressive headline numbers are funded by dilution. It is historically our single best false-positive killer.
Scrub, vet, and rank
What survives is de-duplicated, screened for dilution and known risk patterns, then ranked. The result is a timestamped, immutable snapshot of exactly what the screen surfaced on that date, with a written thesis attached to each name.
See the current shortlists
Research information only. Not investment advice. Exact thresholds and weights are proprietary and not published.